Sweet bike. Wish I wasn’t so tall.

Also, I’m glad I get my Boutique Cycles updates in my RSS, so I can look at the bikes without feeling compelled to read the comments.

Since, usually, Dr Cycle, you are the main commenter. You hurt my head. I don’t know if you sit there with a thesaurus to “compose” your “assessments” or if you really do have a large vocabulary. What I do know is that everything you say seems out of the context of reality, and basically amounts to some kind of editorial masturbation. The way you “write” your “work” is amateur.

If you’re intelligent, cool. But try and keep your dissertations on topic. And thinking that you’re “vanquishing” anyone is a little melodramatic for a site that was made to show off kick-ass bikes.

Speaking of vanquishing, I’ve said all I wanted now. You can post some rebuttal, probably garbled and full of 9-letter, 100-point words, but I won’t respond. Thanks for reading, and I hope that our little talk made you realize that you sound like a pompous ass much of the time.

Dr Cycle, please leave

i have something to say. little toad of a pole that i am, standing. perhaps modernity has not us believe otherwise to the pin of our perceptive minds, but some other matter tells me the argument of our day be but a squirt redundant. the squabble of our petty honours. and what about the bicycles. two wheels? spokes? saddles? antlers? tubes and knots? are we on the backs of moose or egos or maybe they are after all bicycles? maybe then our words be spent on the discussion of such mechanisations in the stead of the defense of our pride?